![]() |
September 22, 2004Going LocalThere's a lot of activity in the social-network-based local listings recommendations arena right now. Think "friendster meets epinions meets local.yahoo.com".
InsiderPages and Judy's Book are social networks (notice the emphasis on "friends helping friends") geared at trusted recommendations of local goods and services. The hope is clearly that if your friends recommend something, you're more likely to try it out than if some stranger posts a recommendation in a local message board, or the local newspaper or other media outlet recommends it. I suppose that would be true. Question is: will people be willing to join yet another social network and drag all their friends over to these services? Judy's Book lists as its #1 benefit getting "connected" -- "find your friends" and "learn more about them -- where they like to eat, shop and more!". I guess I wonder, if they're already your friends, don't you already know where they like to eat, shop, and more? Will a service like this add value to you and your friends, or are you and your friends doing most of the value-add back to this company? I wonder if this application of social networking is going to work. I intend on keeping an eye on these three companies to see how they do. Another way this might work is if it were more peer-to-peer based --- with your friend information (e.g. FOAF) maintained on your local machine, and the recommendations kept private among your trusted friends, but the directories of local goods and services distributed around the net as a web service that anyone could access. Such a model doesn't help these three companies, but it might get faster adoption since you're not joining yet another network.
Comments
The idea of having a site where friends, and friends of friends(many circles converging in difference places), could make recommendations on restaurants, movies, vacations, etc. is a good one. We often end up at places recommended by acquaintances. And sometimes the friend making the recommendation has never been but is relaying the recommendation of someone I don't know but who is considered a trusted source. I think the key is being able to trust the sources. Anyone making a recommendation would have to be able to have a secondary or tertiary relationship with the core group. Make sense? Posted by: Brandon at September 22, 2004 01:35 PMI like the idea of a city-blog or "metro-blog" that all the local bloggers contribute to - whether it's about restaurants or local issues or whatever. Of course, we've got our own at http://sandiegoblog.com. Posted by: oso at September 22, 2004 11:15 PMI am also interested in watching to see whether these companies can make a business of it...I'm looking forward to dialoging with you about it ...stay tuned for our beta-launch in the next few months.
Read More in the Archives:
April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 |
brianstorms is Brian Dear's weblog. Non-spam email:
Be sure to take a look at these other fine websites:
Copyright 2002-2003 Birdrock Ventures.
brianstorms is a trademark of Birdrock Ventures.
|