![]() |
August 31, 2005Not Always an Early AdopterAs someone who runs a technology startup company, I find that sometimes technology sucks, and it's better to avoid some snazzy technical solution and stick with something tried and true. If your time is precious, you go with what works and what takes the least amount of time.For instance, for me, I cannot stand paying bills online. Often, the online solution requires Microsoft Internet Explorer, which I refuse to use. Or, it won't support any Macintosh browsers at all. I don't want an online solution from the utility companies or employee benefits companies or financial services companies or other services that my company is a customer of. I want a bill to arrive in the mail. I'll sign a physical check, pop it in an envelope, put a stamp on it, and mail it. The paper-based system works for me, but if for some reason it breaks (very, very rarely in my experience), I have a nice paper trail and it's straightforward to resolve the problem. Some companies are trying to force you to use their online "solution", and make you go out of your way to request the "paper" way. At some point they're gonna cut off the paper way, and I will not be a happy camper. I've found bill-paying user experiences for phone companies, banks, ISPs, etc., to be wildly uneven, sometimes very unreliable or slow, or they crash with Microsoft SQL Server errors spewing out on screen. These sites are generally a pain to deal with. My company's bank offers automated bill paying. In theory I could have it pay the rent, the phone bill, all the usual stuff. In theory it would save me a lot of time. No way am I gonna ever use it. I just don't want the hassle when it breaks, and I am not informed. I have a certainty that that would happen, and I'd be stuck. Bottom line: on average, it takes me more time to deal with an automated solution day after day than it does a paper-based one. I think part of my reluctance to go completely online with bill paying has to do with when you're running a startup, you need to be very aware of how much money you're spending. My system makes me extremely aware: I write all the checks, I put the stamps on the evelopes, I walk down to the mailbox and mail the payments. If I go online, it's all out of sight, out of mind, and there's no physical, tangible reality to the spending. I vote for sticking to something tangible, a paper-based routine, with Excel spreadsheets and file folders to keep records. It works for me.
What works for you?
Posted by brian at August 31, 2005 06:46 PM
Comments
You mort :-) Posted by: Paul at September 1, 2005 10:36 AMAshamed to say it, but I'm running virtual PC solely so I can use Quickbooks Online on the Mac. A single web app operating system? Posted by: Ross Mayfield at September 1, 2005 11:27 AM
Read More in the Archives:
October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 |
brianstorms is Brian Dear's weblog. Non-spam email:
Be sure to take a look at these other fine websites:
Copyright 2002-2003 Birdrock Ventures.
brianstorms is a trademark of Birdrock Ventures.
|