![]() |
October 31, 2004Jon Stewart, C-SPAN, and the end of television as we know it?Now I know why there are so many Daily Show reruns. Because Jon Stewart and company are spending so much of their time on C-SPAN. And you thought C-SPAN was for nerds. I tell you, it is the best television on television. You just have to give it a chance.In case you missed it, Stewart, Corddry, Helms, and two show producer/writers appeared in a wild, uneven, sometimes funny, sometimes pitifully unfunny program in New York on October 20th which was aired tonight (and is being aired again on C-SPAN on November 1st at 4:00pm Eastern, 1:00pm Pacific. Somebody TiVo it!!!). Here's C-SPAN's description page of the event. The panelists took turns reading from their book, America: The Book. It's amazing how much coverage this book gets on C-SPAN. But these guys are not normal book authors, and they're not there to push the book. They're there to destroy TV as we know it. I believe that Stewart and company are trying to revolutionize television by tearing down its conventional standards and practices. First, dress inappropriately, like a slacker. Stewart's starting to dress like Bill Murray in the early scenes of Stripes. Second, resort to language that's simply not said on television, certainly not C-SPAN. Speak as many four-letter words as possible, so the television audience members marvel in the fact that there are no bleeps like there are on The Daily Show, only occasional and entirely useless on-screen warnings that this program contains bad language. Duh! Prediction: Stewart and company are going to get C-SPAN in big trouble, and somebody's going to try to fine or indict C-SPAN for breaking FCC rules. You watch: some congressman is going to take this one for a ride, and sick the FCC on them but good. At one point, while reading a section of his book America: The Book, Stewart paused and admitted he was bored. It was about then that the whole program began to collapse, the final blow occurring during the Q&A when a woman from the audience went on and on with a rambling rant about the Green Party, refusing to hand over the microphone until it was forcibly taken from her (and then, still ranting more while Stewart cringed at the podium). I can't say this was excellent television. It's fascinating to watch not because it was good, but because it was on at all. Are we witnessing the television revolution being televised, or are we witnessing Jon Stewart and company jumping the shark? We'll see soon enough. Stay tuned. UPDATE -- So, numerous readers have written to me to inform me of the foolishness of my ways: a) that the comments function was still broken (D'oh!), b) that Jon Stewart has been dressing like Bill Murray in Stripes for years, and c) that C-SPAN, since it's on cable, doesn't fall under the same FCC rules as broadcast television. As Jon Stewart might say, Damn you, cable television! Comments
You had better get used to it. How many of the boing boing editor's dicks did you have to suck to get them to link to your baseless argument? Posted by: pe-pee at October 31, 2004 12:07 PMAs of right now, the FCC still has no jurisdiction in the world of cable, but congratulations for posting words on the internet anyways. Very well punctuated. Posted by: Steve Balmerton at October 31, 2004 12:22 PMI wish boingboing still had comments so I could tell them how much they sucked publicly. All the emails i send seem to fall on deaf ears. And if i could stab cory and xeni over the internets, they'd be long dead. If jon stewart destroys television, so be it. No TV would be better than most TV, as it stands today. ps. FUCK YOU XENI, YOUR HAIR FUCKING SUCKS. Posted by: smashy at October 31, 2004 12:38 PMErm... why the heck don't people know that you're allowed to 1) swear, 2) show nudity, 3) show graphic violence on cable television? It's not in the FCC's jurisdiction, as Steve pointed out. I've seen many make this mistake, even people who work in the business! Bill O'Reilly said he wasn't going to say a certain word, lest the FCC fine him. I guess if the people who work in the business don't know it, we can't expect the public at large to know it. Posted by: Mark J at October 31, 2004 12:43 PMI think Xeni's hair fucking rocks. smashy, you totally missed the point.. crazy ass. Posted by: Cowicide at October 31, 2004 02:24 PMI recorded the appearance this morning, and it is very funny. A Divx torrent for your viewing pleasure: http://www.razor.5gigs.com/download.php?id=39&name=Jon_Stewart_NYC_Library_BookTV.divx.torrent Posted by: Mike G at October 31, 2004 03:36 PMI recorded the appearance this morning, and it is very funny. A Divx torrent for your viewing pleasure: http://www.razor.5gigs.com/download.php?id=39&name=Jon_Stewart_NYC_Library_BookTV.divx.torrent Posted by: Mike G at October 31, 2004 03:37 PMPlease chill, people. This is not the place to complain about BoingBoing. If you have a constructive comment to make that is on-topic, fine. Otherwise, please go somewhere else. Thank you. umm... you do realize that jon stewart didn't just appear one day out of the blue on the daily show, right? he was a standup comedian, later taking over arsenio hall's failed late night talk show. if you saw how he dressed back in those days (jeans, tshirt, hat, sometimes a sweater or a leather jacket, typical college student look), i don't think you would be shocked in any way as to how he dresses today... Posted by: darthstupid at October 31, 2004 09:07 PMI believe Mr. Stewart claimed that the _audience_ was getting bored -- after reading the room using his comedian-honed audience-gauging superpower -- and thus skipped over some of the text. Which is, actually, rather hit or miss, having finished it just before coincidenta||y coming across The Young Lions (Rarrrrr!) presentation of said Stewart & Co not twenty minutes after the cable guy finished installing the whole mess (no offer of "illegal" cable, though. Was I supposed to tip him?). In closing, I'd like to say that no matter who wins on November 2nd, we all lose. Thank you. PS: "Your comment could not be submitted due to questionable content: denta|." WTF? Posted by: Tim "Pudgeface" Russert at October 31, 2004 10:35 PMi don't want to go on a rant here but.... smashy... you're an idiot, you are one of those people who go to w4prez.com and complain about how that guy is a stupid conservative and send him an appropriately idiotic email. now for the record, xeni has a unique look and i happen to like it. no matter if somebody took a baseball bat to her she would still be more attractive because she is cooler than most of the opposite sex (for me, the veeemen). secondly, brian, there is probably no better way to get people to comment off-topic than saying "stick to the topic" especially when you are on a website called "brainstorms.com" and following a gaggle of boingboingers. Mr. Russert, i'm convinced that you are the actual meet the press guy and use the pudge face thing as a mascarade... am i right? so to get back on topic here. complaining about someone trying to change a news/entertainment media warped by partisan ownership and ratings wars is like b!tching at the firefighter trying to save your house. is that a fair analogy? nope. jon stewart looks horrible in red and would never wake up in the night to fight anything but his baby's crying. sooo.... you should do a little research into your subject (the FCC rules thing is just stupid of you) and the history of the bashee (jon stewart is a good guy). Posted by: jerzy at November 1, 2004 02:07 AMLay off the crack, jerzy. Posted by: blogtard at November 1, 2004 03:20 AMJESUS GOD, IS THIS THE XENI FAN CLUB? OHHHH XENI, OMGhi2U! I JUST ADORE YOUR RAZOR SHARP FACE!!1! Posted by: SMASHY at November 1, 2004 07:01 AMMaybe you should not submit to boing boing again? Posted by: JL at November 1, 2004 10:47 AMI don't understand how C-Span would get in trouble for this. They have rebroadcast thousands upon thousands of swear words and other "inappropriate" language in their live coverage of the Senate and House of Representatives; they've even covered FCC hearings when the previous director of the FCC used "inappropriate" language. They aired the current President of the United States giving the camera the middle-finger gesture and smiling when he thought the camera was off. Why would a couple of pundits get them in trouble? Posted by: Rodney at November 1, 2004 11:36 AMEven though the Daily Show is "fake news", it's more real than the constant stream of fear and manipulative drivel that the networks have to dish out. I love that Jon Stewart is bringing "slackers" to awareness. The only warning bell that's going off in my head is that Jon is getting too serious and is in danger of becoming seriously boring. A deadly sin in TVland. Posted by: Elliot Feldman at November 1, 2004 12:39 PM
Read More in the Archives:
April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 |
brianstorms is Brian Dear's weblog. Non-spam email:
Be sure to take a look at these other fine websites:
Copyright 2002-2003 Birdrock Ventures.
brianstorms is a trademark of Birdrock Ventures.
|